-
Signage confusion validates no identifying markings
Signage confusion validates no identifying markings however they could have just faked the evidence but the general idea is the public is just too stupid risk it and even tail numbers of other plane would not cause the slightest stir. Most 9/11 Truth memes assume the government criminals would display correct evidence i.e serial numbers on seats, paint schemes and other markings so they collectively never bothered to look..and collectively never ask museums anything..
9/11 Aircraft on public display does not show any identifying evidence of Flight 11 or Flight 175 however a review public aircraft debris shows the possibility of the "Green Plane" identified by FDNY Marine 6 and NYPD Special Operations Radio Communications. This dark green paint has since been changed to the correct yellow.. But for a time the dark green paint was an identifying mark to validate radio communications which proves it was not Flight 11 or Flight 175...
Signage confusion validates no identifying markings
9/11 Aircraft on public display does not show any identifying evidence of Flight 11 or Flight 175 however a review public aircraft debris shows the possibility of the "Green Plane" identified by FDNY Marine 6 and NYPD Special Operations Radio Communications. This dark green paint has since been changed to the correct yellow.. But for a time the dark green paint was an identifying mark to validate radio communications which proves it was not Flight 11 or Flight 175...
9/11 Special Operations Division Communications Dark Green Plane
-
-
We can now rule out the 9/11 official theory (again) using the National September 11 Memorial Museum object labeled "Flight 11"! Originally only the primer side was shown until now. The National September 11 Memorial Museum actually makes the greatest mistake since Larry Silverstein - Pull It (PBS).
I can understand now why the part was labeled "Flight 175"!
National September 11 Memorial Museum labeled a large piece of fuselage as "Flight 11"!, however has not a single bit of AA color on it and yet it still labeled Flight 11. In the past it traveled state to state, county to county as "flight 175" and "Flight 11"
The next t issue is explaining why the paint is different or missing. Do explosions remove paint? Is there another example of plane part without its markings do to fire, or an impact or anything ?
New 2014 9/11 Survivor: Second Plane Witness Says "It was NOT Flight 175"
Conclusions:
Some videos were faked and some photos, but not all.
Some videos were faked and some photos, but not all.
National September 11 Memorial Museum GRAY ONLY fuselage color scheme matches up with this witness testimony.
He also reported the earthquake just before impact.
The fake witnesses never will include the ground shaking issue . The Naudet brothers are a perfect example of making sure the official line was correct..before the official theory was formed. Naudet brothers should be included in the crime of the century.
- Alternating Plane Part now stands at Flight 11
Before we had the WTC Museum right at Ground zero we had the 9/11 Traveling Museum Motor Home which displayed parts rather haphazardly with different signs for the same fragments of the fuselage alternating based on different days. So I wondered what the problem was.
Could the NEW National September 11 Memorial Museum in New York have on display the OLD 9/11 Traveling Museum Motor Home fragments ?
9/11 Traveling Museum Motor Home fragments |
If the fragments of the fuselage at National September 11 Memorial Museum in New York Side A of Side B 9/11 Traveling Museum Motor Home then we have our answer to mystery of
alternating the identification between Flight 11 and Flight 175.
The answer is Side A or the paint side just happens 1. Never had color scheme 2. The parts had the correct colors and identification markers however those markers just happened to be burned off 3. The painted side color scheme was removed. Take Your Pick!
No comments:
Post a Comment