For example. From radar and GoogleEarth 911maps.kml 911 maps I was able to pinpoint the exact moment Flight 11 started going off its flight path.. all other areas of interest go offline too..but I did not know that.. I double blinded myself..
The problem is Flight 11 is lost and flies NORTH past air force military bases but somehow gets help and starts a new flight path from beyond Albany NY which lines up perfectly with the North Tower!.. autopilot anyone?
At 8:13, air traffic controllers at the FAA’s Boston Center in Nashua, New Hampshire, instructed Flight 11 to climb to 35,000 feet. The plane did not respond to, or obey the order, and its transponder was turned off. Air traffic controller Glen Michael said, "We considered it at the time to be a possible hijacking."
"FAA regulations stipulate that an aircraft emergency exists when there is an unexpected loss of radar contact, loss of radio communications, or both. If air traffic controllers believed Flight 11 had a major emergency at 8:13, then NORAD should have been notified immediately and military jets scrambled to investigate. The FAA and NORAD both claim that NORAD wasn’t informed until 8:40, a full 27 minutes later. One NORAD employee later claimed that notification occurred at 8:31.
Before contacting NORAD, Boston air traffic control watched Flight 11 make an unexpected 100-degree turn and head toward New York City. They informed other controllers of the emergency at 8:25 who all then allegedly heard dialog from the cockpit such as: "Nobodymove please, we are going back to the airport. Don’t try to make any stupid moves." Boston Center even asked the pilots of soon to be "hijacked" Flight 175 to scan the skies for the errant Flight 11."
If NORAD’s claim is false, and it was indeed informed within the time frame outlined in the FAA regulations that Flight 11 had a serious emergency, and possible hijacking; it would mean that NORAD did absolutely nothing for nearly one half of an hour while an airliner flew off course in some of the most congested airspace in the world. Heads should have rolled. But again, no one at the FAA or NORAD was even scolded.
According to alleged phone calls made by flight attendants Betty Ong 904-555-0004 and Amy Sweeny 904-555-0004, the hijackers had already stabbed and killed one passenger and two flight attendants by 8:21. After 8:21, both women allegedly remained on the phones with American Airlines Headquarters for 25 MINUTES, until their plane then hit the WTC North Tower.
BTW: Daniel Lewin, who was allegedly stabbed by hijacker Satam al-Suqami prior to American Airlines flight 11 crashing into the WTC, was/is an officer in an elite secret unit of the Israeli military called Matkal Sayeret that was instrumental in orchestrating Mossad activities prior to 9/11.
http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id15.htmlFlight 11 started diverging from its flight path at 8:13, flew past Westover Air Reserve Base,
then flew past Stratton Air National Guard Base, Schenectady; Gained by: Air Mobility Command turned and next flew to left of Albany NY over more airports and then from 08:26:26 to 8:46:00 - 20 minutes later hit N.Tower.
Both Westover Air Reserve Base and 1 Air National Guard Rd, Schenectady, NY 12302 http://www.109aw.ang.af.mil/ had no response .. The 109th Air Wing had no idea that flight 11 was wayward for 13 minutes?
Anyone can solve this problem.. First I need distance traveled by each plane.. Flight 11, Flight 175, Flight 77, Flight 93. Next Start and End Time. This should give you average speed for each plane..Chances are we get into the Mach numbers of only a few aircraft like the X-43 but this is just a guess.. But I would like to know.. GoogleEarth 911maps.kml is a google place to start. I am not sure if Google Earth has a distance tool..If it does all we need is time..Time Then Distance = Speed then smaller faster planes..
 |
| Not Flight 11 or Flight 175 |
9 11 Intended Routes USA
9/11 maps have collected RADES84 data, documents from 911datasets.org, photos, videos, maps and plenty of useful documents to produce an all-in-one tool called 9/11 maps allowing anyone to look at this whole documentation at one place and from a timely and comprehensive perspective. You can follow the events of the day just as if you were looking at a radar screen. But you can do many other things. 9/11maps is a Google Earth program that allows anyone to watch and search the events of 9/11.
http://www.11-septembre.com/GoogleEarth/911maps.kml
Average Total Speed Formula: Speed = Distance ÷ Time
Flight 11 Using Google Earth is
454.4680 mph = 356 miles / 47 minutes
 |
| Total Distance and Speed flight 11 |
 |
| Total Distance and Speed Flight 175 |
 |
| Total Distance Speed Flight 77 |
 |
| Total Distance Speed Flight 93 |
Korean Air 85 was forced to squawk 7500 emergency on 9/11
false flag
9/11 INTERCEPTED - Brought to you by Pilots For 9/11 Truth
Contacted
sklepaurora@gmail.com
Harald Meling Let's have some fun then.
" ..As stated in Section 5.3.2 of NIST NCSTAR 1, a document from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) indicated that the impact of a [single, not multiple] Boeing 707 aircraft was analyzed during the design stage of the WTC towers. However, NIST investigators were unable to locate any documentation of the criteria and method used in the impact analysis and, therefore, were unable to verify the assertion that "... such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building...."..".
Maybe NIST should keep "looking"? Or outsource "looking" to independent investigators whose salary is not dependent on the outcome? Didn't think you thought so.
" ..As stated in Section 5.3.2 of NIST NCSTAR 1, a document from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) indicated that the impact of a [single, not multiple] Boeing 707 aircraft was analyzed during the design stage of the WTC towers. However, NIST investigators were unable to locate any documentation of the criteria and method used in the impact analysis and, therefore, were unable to verify the assertion that "... such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building...."..".
Maybe NIST should keep "looking"? Or outsource "looking" to independent investigators whose salary is not dependent on the outcome? Didn't think you thought so.
ReligiousIntolerant1 day ago