Sunday, March 22, 2020

9-11 Radio Events and Hijacked Flights Take off Times: Coincidence or military contingency planning

9/11 Military Controlled and Staged





The single biggest 9/11 mystery of 9/11 was the cockpit and radio events and contingency planning of hijacked flights wheels off timing on 9/11. Whenever cockpit door opened or radio event  was recorded, another plane took off! What are the chances of this happening without contingency planning? It seems like the NORAD or someone else was listening for degrees of success in order to launch the next wave of attacks. If “Atta” said "we have some planes" that seemed to have the effect of launching the next plane. I think when AA11 door was breached at 8:14 that is when the next plane was sent.. 8:14 was the time American flight 11 started going the wrong direction and flew directly at NEADS Rome NY headquarters! It would be ironic justice if the Flight 11 got confused and impacted the 9/11 remote controllers terminal.  


9-11 Radio Events and Hijacked Flights Take off Times: Coincidence or military contingency planning

Event tracker             

Flight 11 wheels off 
Flight 11 off flight path @ 8:14                                 Start take off of UAL Flight 175!       
United Airline 175 Radio halted Event:                   Start Take off of UAL Flight 93!
American Flight 11 transponder signal halt:          Start take off of AA Flight 77

Every level of success was met by a butterfly effect on the ground.  

No mystery or contingency planning. The take off times for all flights was available to the passengers ahead of time. Terroriest coordination and advance planning was not coincidental but deliberate . No military contingency planning because flight 93 failed to hit it’s target and crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. That is not a result of America military precision contingency planning . NORAD had no authority over take off times for commercial airliners . This would explain why flight 93 was 42 minutes late from takeoff. Lastly the blog incorrectly mentioned ATA (American transport association) as ATTA.
2 views
View Upvoters
 · Answer requested by Dan Plesse
Upvote
·
1
Share



Add Comment
no ATTA is correct. I meant hijacker #1 on flight 11.
You have no idea what I am talking about do you? When AA11 shifted north at 8:14 to head to NEADS, do you really think that was the idea? The “terrorist” didn’t fly over air force bases as a master stroke of genius or by sheer luck the military just so happened to “standing down” on 9/11 as officials have talked about in public for years. Norman Mineta is now so senile he forgets what a stand down order means and spills the beans.
9/11 Military Stand Down Order Evidence By Norman Mineta




No comments:

Search