Sunday, December 13, 2020

Bush Did 9/11 by Letting It Happen On Purpose

9/11 Context: War Games 

Tragic day The 1st At Force public affairs officer was in the middle of a NORAD-wide air defense exercise when the day's events unfolded. 

"Operation Amalgam Virgo  (9/11) Amalgam Virgo 01 and 02

A war game was planned before the attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center,"  Arias said.

“We were preparing for aviation terrorism already,” he said. “We just finished a simulation of a terrorist hijacking of a passenger airliner. Now we’re doing small aircraft.”

What was suppose to happen? 

"Bush would spend a few minutes reading to schoolchildren and urging Congress to pass his education reform package." My guess is this was all to be done from the same reading room. a  "scrub trip" however maybe not. Then, he and his entourage of aides, Secret Service agents, and reporters would make the 90-minute flight back to Andrews Air Force Base outside Washington.

 What actions was the president supposed to make if he was not guilty of 9/11?

 1. Never give away your location during terrorism activities unless you are in control and have foreknowledge. 

George Bush went back to the White House and gave away his location to the world at 8:00 p.m. George Bush also gave away his other locations. A total three times on 9/11. If he wasn’t in control of 9/11, why would do that?

2. Ask questions and look interested, unless you already know all the answers and have a better understanding of the terror events!

Comments
1. I would expect a president should have called the F.A.A headquarters.

I would expect a president who was informed of an attack on the the USA to get up and go out and find out what was going on. I would expect him to ask if the White House was being evacuated. I would expect him to ask if there was an air defense above D.C. Call the FAA!!!

Pres George Bush "What the hell is going on!!" FAA "Well sir we have XYZ happening and the military is refusing to respond because of chain of command issues, then after that they don't know what to do and placed fake radar returns on the screens and that is not all sir!"  George "great we have a coup d'é·tat". 

3. Never pre-announce a major event before it happens unless you already know what is going to happen, so you don't look like you can see into future or seem like you planned the attack yourself and can't wait to go to work and i.e don't jump the gun. 


Jerome sent January 25 at 11:13 AM

what is the george bush communication that indicates foreknowledge of 911? I didn't know the answer.
Seen by Jerome at December 31, 1969 at 7:00 PM

You sent Today at 10:12 PM

President George was asked about the first plane by a nearby reporter. He asked him "Do you know about what is happening in New York" George said "he will talk about that later" which he did but that was already after the second plane hit which signaled terrorism and also during the third plane count down to hit the pentagon. This was still early when the reporter asked him the question and during this time the plane could still be considered an accident and not requiring an update by the president. So George jumped the gun a little bit by saying he was going to talk about it later. Its a small hint that he knew more at that point then anyone else.


Part I

At no time during 9/11 did George reveal any information about the other missing planes flight 77 and flight 93, but he did reveal that a new press announcement that was to begin at some point and it was based on the events in New York, even before the second plane hits the South Tower.  

They whispered we are under attack to him and he chose to stay at the school because he knew nobody at that school was in danger.


So that means they had foreknowledge of 9/11 events. The only problem I have with this is it has been part of the literature from the very beginning. Even Micheal Moore got into this idea with Fahrenheit 9/11 and Loose Change and all the rest. The word hackneyed comes to mind.. By 8:00 pm George made his way back to the White House for his third speech and but time he was selling a the war footing tone filled with lies to make the New Pearl Harbor into the “catastrophic and catalyzing event” PNAC war pushers and Israel required to unlock the full potential of evil. The problems and thus solutions were 1. Scare some money out of congress and increase the war budget. 3. Allow the CIA greater freedoms to conduct human rights abuses and allow the creation of Black Sites CIA Extraordinary Rendition - Google My Maps.. 4. Blame the Palestinians and Muslims in order dehumanize and justify more crimes against them inside those Black Sites and drone strike them relentlessly and forever . 5. Build war palaces, military bases all over the middle east to do more of the above. 6. deduce resistance from others for all of this above. 7. Create the “it was for oil issue” as cover for all of the above CIA, military, budget and human rights abuses and crimes. 

9/11 unlocked all of this evil in a few short years without any resistance from anyone. They would gotten away clean too if it wasn't for a few individuals pointing out a few things but somehow even now the public is still not onboard because they more or less are in agreement with bombing of women and children and the general warmongering . 

 The public somehow can't make the connection back to its source.

The 
Gulf of Tonkin Attack is the same playbook as 9/11 and so was the USS Liberty Attack.. It just keeps happening.  It works so well even a caveman can do it . I think they retired that playbook now, The same 10% of population that resisted the British in 1776 has won again if that playbook is been put out to pasture. But you never know. 

“Bush hinted it was about terror attacks at 8:53” By that time, all four aircraft are up in the air and likely missing, off there flight path or something has gone wrong i.e controllers' text message not taken seriously "lock doors" .


 
Each step on 9/11 was synchronized in stages according to a successful hijacking,

For example, another plane would launch after 8:13 takeover of flight 11, or  flight 175 would launch at 8:14 and so on.. 

Part II

Was Bush connected to the FAA or was he in the dark? 

“Why would you wait and not ask for information?”

Oh, Dan, Dan, Dan. How amazingly ignorant you are.

The President is surrounded by people whose job there is to gather the information and give it to the president. He doesn’t need to ask. He will get the information when it arrives.

“People who are in c

 … (more)

Why are you claiming the “the people around the president” are trustworthy when clearly they were not.

Wiki Quote
9:29 “No one in the President's traveling party has any information during this time that other aircraft were hijacked or missing. 
[45]

However two people who were with the president were linked to the phone bridges JOC, PEOC and monitoring the Secret Service and staff radio channels which also means they are connected with the FAA.

Col. Mark Tillman

: Everything started coming alive. We were hooked into the PEOC [the White House bunker] and the JOC [Joint Operations Center], for the Secret Service. They’re all in the link now."

Master Sgt. Dana Lark

"We’re just monitoring the Secret Service and staff radio channels. It was chaos. What’s next? All of a sudden, other reports start coming in—explosion at the White House, car bomb at the State Department. We’re under attack."

The JOC and the PEOC where linked to the FAA on 9/11.


His omissions of the size and scale of  9/11 was in effect meant to maximize the damage caused to the United States and to harvest the effects believed to exist by PNAC's New Pearl Harbor's founders.  The Pentagon attack was 8 minutes after The New York was Attacked speech at 9:29. 

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. “  


Bush Did 9/11 by Letting It Happen On Purpose or LIHOP 





What announcement did George Bush make on the morning of 9/11 which hints that he knew the full scope of the September 11th terror attacks?
 
What did George Bush say which spilled the beans about 9/11 foreknowledge with Andy Card making him criminally responsible for 9/ 11?

Sonya Rossreporter, Associated Press: This was a garden variety trip. It was low-ranking staff and a lot of the top journalists didn’t come. It was a scrub trip.

Do "scrub trips" normally have the 
presidential podium  set up with a room staged and filled with people? 



At 9:29 eight minutes before Flight 77 impact, the president held his tongue about the on going crisis in D.C. in all his speeches. 


OK, so they DO have a special portable presidential podium. Just as I expected.

The point was they brought all the equipment to make an major announcement, while Bush hinted it was about terror attacks before the terror attacks at 8:53 by mistake.


8:55President George W. Bush arrives at Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida
9:03: President Bush enters a classroom as part of his school visit.
9:05Chief of Staff Andrew Card interrupts to whisper to the president, "A second plane has hit the second tower. America is under attack."
9:14: President Bush returns to an adjacent classroom commandeered by the U.S. Secret Service

9:37
:* President Bush makes his first public statements about the attacks, in front of an audience of about 200 teachers and students at the elementary school. He states that he will be going back to Washington. "Today, we've had a national tragedy," he starts. "Two airplanes… have crashed… into the World Trade Center… in an apparent terrorist attack on our country," and leads a moment of silence. No one in the President's traveling party has any information during this time that other aircraft were hijacked or missing.[45]   

CHERYL RYEFIELD 2002 testimony said she was listening to Bush terror attack speech on the radio while flight 77 hit the Pentagon.

 President Bush makes his first public statements about the attacks at the same time flight 77 hit the Pentagon



1:04
9/11 Remarks at Barksdale Air Force Base:  no information revealed again. Nothing about hijackings yet.  Basically you are left with your imagination and details don't matter because you are not to switch on your analytical  part of your brain. Not until its too late away. 

15 minutes of foot dragging 9:14 - 9:29.   

The quote in question: 

"He [the President] got out of his hotel suite this morning, was about to leave, reporters saw the White House chief of staff, Andy Card, whisper into his ear. The reporter said to the president, 'Do you know what's going on in New York?' He said he did, and he said he will have something about it [i.e. a statement] later."

After all he got the presidential podium with him, maybe that was reason to ask what was happening in New York.  

source:

Special Report, 'Planes Crash into World Trade Center,' ABC News, September 2001, 8:53 AM ET.

Backstory:

Normally presidents never talk about current events, but George pre-announces a conference before 8:53.  However later, with the presidential podium in tow he announces only two events and forgets or omits the word hijacking to this speech.  Was "have something about it" linked to the  large terrorism events of 9/11. Did Bush already link the first plane, flight 11 with the total 9/11 attack i.e foreknowledge!  via his omissions. All four flights were impacting or missing at this point for two hours.  Who was his speech writer.  

Full Quote 

in an ABC News ‘Special Report’ John Cochran reported; “Peter, as you know, the president’s down in Florida talking about education. He got out of his hotel this morning , was about to leave, reporters saw the White House chief of staff, Andy Card, whisper into his ear. The reporter said to the president, ‘Do you know what’s going on in New York?’ He said he did, and he said he will have something about it later. His first event is about half an hour at an elementary school in Sarasota, Florida.”

Back Back Story: 

The phone bridges with the FAA were set up pretty fast and with the secret service, therefore it could be reasonable he was told that Flight 11 was a hijack at that moment BEFORE Andy Card whispered into his ear the first time and therefore reasonable that he would be announcing a press release afterward but he never said a word hijacked airliners.   

Why would so many members of the press be interested in reading comprehension in a poor black school in Florida?  Is that news? That alone seems fishy. Holding a sign "Not yet" more fishy! A cattle call to follow the president to a classroom. Fishy! The presidential podium Fishy! 

The catch-22 is if everyone did their job the president would have known about the hijacking at around 8:20. Also if flight 11 turned right for a second and continued along its normal flight path, the impact would be too soon and all the 9/11 flights would have been grounded and thus spoiling the events of 9/11. The president definitely couldn't do his 
Emma E. Booker Elementary School scam. The whole ball of rubber would be a mess.  

Other spoiling events would have been texting to all flights about the hijacks by the controllers. Lucky controllers dropped word hijack or HJK in the nick of time as to not  alarm the pilots. However one controller said something like "bar the cockpit door" Flight 93 which they responded with a lame reply: Okay!. The reply should have been, Why?  What would controllers have done then. Spilled the beans? No chance of that. 

The flight paths for the 9/11 flight was never an issue of the 9/11 Commission Report and most people don't know about flight paths and that they are registered with the FAA. This tells me the 9/11 Commission Report used the public's ignorance of the general topics  on every issue it could as to defend of the indefensible crime of 9/11. This stupid-is-as stupid-does-strategy of the commission worked like a charm and the John Q Public got the report its tiny brain could handle and they went back to the ballgame feeling just as ignorant as before and blissful as a new born baby.  
    

 Hi, Daniel -- 
   cc to Jane Clark and Dave Meiswinkle  
   Yes, I've seen this extremely important videotaped testimony by Pentagon Army Public Affairs civilian employee Cheryl Reyfield
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=215bbK_BPOs You sent in the below and have cc'd Jane and Dave on this as They may not have yet.  The two most important parts of her testimony -- 1) beginning at 
c. 1:12 min. that a plane was destroyed in a fireball at the Pentagon while Bush was on the radio speaking at the press briefing at the Florida School, and 2) at c. 15:55 min. that the plane was marked with the Stars of the Air Force -- are both consistent with the findings of 'Behind The Smoke Curtain' which marshals the evidence that the plane approach, destruction and explosion stopped the outside Heliport clock at 9:32:30, much earlier than the official story alleged impact time of Flight 77 of 9:37:46 (April Gallop's watch was stopped in the outer E Ring at 9:30 from an even earlier inside explosion).  She saw the plane approach and explosion while Bush was speaking at the Florida press briefing which began at c 9:30 and was suddenly cut short by the Secret Service which urgently removed him from the building precisely because they had just received word that the Pentagon had been attacked during the briefing.  Because Cheryl assumed the official story is true, i.e. that Flight 77, a commercial airliner, was the Pentagon plane, after holding up the drawing She made of the plane She saw immediately afterwards She mused that maybe She'd seen 'two planes'.  But from all the evidence in 'Smoke Curtain' We know that You don't need to hypothesize two planes as the relative timing proves that the plane She saw couldn't have been Flight 77.  Also supporting that insead It was the plane whose destruction in a fireball near the Heliport stopped the Heliport clock   at 9:32:30 is the fact that this was just a few seconds after a Marine Corps attack helicopter that had been buzzing near the West Wall and over to I 395 and back suddenly flew off from the Pentagon.  
From her testimony the fact that emergency responders raced out of the building immediately after the fireball means that They almost certainly were already in place for the 'exercise' scheduled for there that morning on how personnel would respond to the threat of a plane on a flight path towards the building.  High ranking Army General James Civarelli told two first responders I've interviewed that the Pentagon was holding a pre-scheduled 'exercise' on this scenario  that morning. That Cheryl first saw the plane at/near the Navy Annex, also, is consistent with the testimony of two Sheraton Hotel maids I've interviewed who were in the ballroom on the top floor of the Hotel that morning when there was an extremely loud and growing screeching noise, the building shook and then the huge plate glass window they were looking out of facing the Pentagon's West side was filled by a plane as They watched It descend and explode in a fireball at/by the building, as both the Sheraton and Navy Annex were in the flight path.  The FBI quickly arrived at the Sheraton, took the video the employees were watching that they had retrieved from one of the security cameras as well as all the others, and ordered the employees not to talk about what They saw.  One of the maids who saw It from the Ballroom happened to be the one for my room when    I stayed there for the Pentagon Conference on the 9/11 Anniversary a few years ago.  She took Me to the Ballroom and showed Me exactly what She saw standing at the window where She and the other maid, her friend and co-worker, saw It.  Finally, her perspective from I27, like so many others stuck on the highway and elsewhere, could not distinguish between a plane being destroyed by remote signal just before it would otherwise have hit the wall and actually hitting the wall.  'Smoke Curtain' marshals the evidence that the c. 9:32:30 approaching plane, which She saw, was actually the plane for the 'exercise' that was destroyed by a remote control signal just before it would otherwise have hit the wall and that the destruction in the wall and internally was by other means ... 

   Barbara  

Hi Dan,

My guess is that he got his instructions on a need to know basis - he is too dumb to be trusted with much more.

So he may have known only just before what was happening.

Xray

Thanks Ray I am still working on it. It turns out he did have a script to read from. 

They most likely told him he was going to make an announcement and he slowly found out what that announcement  was .

They brought in everything they needed. 


Hi Dan,

Yeh, just happened to have the podium there to hand.
Does he appear to be reading from or referencing the script?

Ray

Hi Ray, 

     It looks like they wrote one thing on one page and he flipped through as to look like he had volumes of information. 
  
"I have spoken to the Vice President, to the Governor of New York, to the Director of the FBI, and have ordered that the full resources of the federal government go to help the victims and their families, and -- and to conduct a full-scale investigation to hunt down and to find those folks who committed this act." 

At no time during 9/11 did George reveal any important information even when asked directly. He only revealed that a press announcement was to begin later in the day.  

This behavior was in effect meant to maximize damage to the United States and to harvest the effects of the New Pearl Harbor.   

Hi Ray, 

   That sounds about right.

What I found out was he didn't say any details at all. He never said the word hijack or hijacked for example. 

His first announcement sounded like the attacks were over and clearly they were not.

The Pentagon was impacted 9:37. and his speech was around 9:29 .. That's 8 minutes before impact. 

He could have given warnings about Flight 77. The whole area should have been evacuated by then. but no.. 


1 comment:

Anonymous said...

It is fair to say the September Clues research has established these 4 main points:
1- The 9/11 imagery was nothing but a Hollywood-style film production, complete with actors in the role of 'eye-witnesses' or 'firefighters', staged 'running crowds', 3D-compositing and special cinematic effects. The '9/11 movie' was split into a number of short clips and sold to the TV audience as 'newscasts'. The few clips featuring 'airplanes' (or dull silhouettes thereof) were computer-generated images - all of which in stark conflict with each other, as now comprehensively demonstrated in every imaginable manner, angle and method.
2- No commercial airliners were hijacked or - much less - crashed into the WTC towers, the Pentagon or the Shanksville field. No valid/verifiable records exist for : their airport logs/schedules, their numbered parts, their alleged passengers. Their reported speeds at near sea-level as well as the absurd visuals of their total, effortless disappearance into the WTC façades defy the laws of mechanics and physics - and the absence of visible wake vortexes in the WTC impact imagery also defies the laws of aerodynamics.
3- The World Trade Center Complex (9 buildings in all) were demolished with powerful explosives. No image-analyses of the tower collapses can help determine just what type of explosives were employed - since the videos are 3D animations and do not represent the real-life events. In reality, as they collapsed, the WTC complex was most likely enveloped by military-grade smoke obscurants. No real/private imagery exists of the morning's events - 'thanks' to electromagnetic countermeasures.
1. A general overview of what technology the 9/11 hoax relied upon:
THE POWER OF IMAGERY : http://www.septemberclues.info/power_of_imagery.htm
2. What would be the purpose of fabricating an alleged terror attack - with fake victims?
DECONSTRUCTING 911 : http://www.septemberclues.info/deconstructing.htm
3. What is the source-material of September Clues?
What did the 5 US TV networks broadcast on the morning of 9/11?
THE 9/11 TV ARCHIVES : http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1295
FAQ1: http://www.septemberclues.info/faq_1.shtml
4. What about the many "amateur videos" we have seen?
FAQ2: http://www.septemberclues.info/faq_2.htm
911 AMATEUR 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM
911 AMATEUR 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjQmxS-DpyM
911 AMATEUR 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI3ZpLuz3ts
THE PLANE FACTS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkZKOqYMbXo

Search