Cataloging the crimes of 9/11: Dear Plane Spotters Did Flight 175 have white wings and a white stripe?

Monday, September 15, 2014

Dear Plane Spotters Did Flight 175 have white wings and a white stripe?

Plane Spotters Polling returned one email

Planespotters.net has Flight 175 as Written off

CN 21873/41 N612UA

Did Flight 175 have white wings and a white stripe?

torrent NTSB_FOIA_Appeal_2012_00001 in a folder named "WTC Photos" there is a power pointpresentation that is named "Does not look like NTSB record--N612U_9_11.ppt"

1990s: the CKS Group-designed "Battleship Gray" and dark blue fuselage

" ... Mark Burnback:
"I did not see any windows on the side..the plane was flying low...I was probably..a block away from the sub-way in Brooklyn and that plane came down very low.....and again it was not a normal flight that I have ever seen at an airport ...it was a plane with a blue logo on the front and it just ... looked like it did not belong in this area....
New 9/11 Flight 175 witness Ricki DeSantis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3g4SGTBJTw

Police removed there video of Flight 175 just like at the Pentagon
http://investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com/2014/08/911-nypd-police-helicopter-and-flight.html

Caryn Wolf carynwolf@mac.com

Nov 6 (1 day ago)

to me

Hi Dan-

Kindly cease contact us.

Caryn Wolf

5:30 PM (1 hour ago)

to me

Dan

This is the last time we are going to ask you to stop trying to contact us. Your future emails are going to be stopped by our spamblocker so we will never see them and you will not hear from us again.

I got please stop these questions or reply from plane spotters..
Write something...

Jeffrey Harr 1. I can't speak for Juan, but NOT seeing something is proof of nothing, whether truthers understand this or not.
2. Because the plane was moving quickly.
3. Who says he kept quiet?

Here's my question for you: Why do you only consider information that agreed with you, while tossing out actual evidence?

Dan Plesse Jeffrey Harr

" 1. I can't speak for Juan, " Juan has been doing lots speaking. He is very visible. He also the body parts flying into the lobby witness, which naudet brothers documentary somehow missed.

If Juan can't verify the other Mr. "undersigned" "blue tail" then that witness has to be removed, right? Google "Witness Verification"

Everyone should be able to Verify and validate each others story.

In a city of millions it boils down one witness who can't even say he saw anything, right? The reference point refers to "undersigned".

As far as I know 100% video taped witness say every color but blue i.e the Flight 175 paint scheme.

Parts shown on display are not even close.

"2. Because the plane was moving quickly." back to bullshit again?
"3. Who says he kept quiet?" Search engines say so Jeff
"tossing out actual evidence?" actually that small blurb agrees with my photographs of the NYPD Drone and the Circling Plane Jeffrey Harr.

I asked Ricki if the plane had a blue tail and black or blue spot logo near the front.

Just now · Edited · Like

In Summary

Dan Plesse

9 mins · Edited

In Summary The closest to Flight 175 paint scheme witness was a small blurb which was in writing from a police report : (the blue tail witness) "blue tail" page 5
http://adam.pra.to/public/mir/www.thememoryhole.org/911/pa-transcripts/pa-police-reports01.pdf

However most shots of the circling plane has a dark tail and even my NYPD photo has a Dark colored tail. Therefore they could have gotten that part right.

The circling plane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1yQfgEElmo
NYPD Drone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkRRKVXwcmk
Source of Drone photo
http://torrents.thepiratebay.org/5823597/911_FOIA_Release_of_3_160_Electronic_Records_of_The_WTC_Collapse.5823597.TPB.torrent
Most photos were removed and you can only see this in "FOIA Release of 3 160 Electronic Records" because its the only release which kept the original file numbers.

Dan Plesse Jeffrey Harr That is not my question. Can you please answer about the "blue logo" witness if you really searched for the color "blue".

Can you explain your faulty search results? YES or NO?

7 mins · Edited · Like

Jeffrey Harr I don't care. The guy said blue tail.

6 mins · Like

Dan Plesse So you agree and already know about the blue logo witness and knew your results were faulty? Because you are not disagreeing with the existence of that witness?

"blue tail" agrees with many planes does it not? including 9/11 drones. Correct ?

Well at least you tried. Sorry it didn't work out for you.

Just now · Edited · Like

View all 32 replies

Buddy Rasberry

46 minutes ago

I am gay, but I was sleeping on the floor of a friend's apartment in San Francisco when the first plane hit, and barely saw the second hit on the news after being woken up. My ex is nuts. I wasn't hacked, he just used my account to be able to comment on a video. I had no idea it was connected to Google +. Anyway, have a nice day folks. Oh, he, my ex, Jordon Eaton, was not there. Not even close.

Reply

·

danp5648

1 second ago

+Buddy Rasberry I had experienced many witnesses now who just want to be apart of 9/11 and be included for some reason. We had people like "Alicia Esteve Head" famous faker "rescued by the man in the red bandana " story. The "Bubby Raseberry" story, "9/11 Journalism Online Eye Witness Interview" 9/11 Journalism Online Eye Witness Interview Flight 175 Attempted turns out to be a faker too. Ricki who claimed to have photos of the plane. No photo exists so far Ricki DeSantis Second Plane was a drone 2014

I searched for Flight 175 witness with right color scheme of flight 175 didn't result in a single positive eye witness account.
http://investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com/2014/09/faa-forced-squawk-fake-7500-on-911.html

Show less

Reply

·